1. Honourable Union minister Mr. Prakash Javadekar, while addressing a political rally in Delhi, said that, Delhi CM is a terrorist.
2, According to PJ, AK had sometime referred to himself as an 'anarchist'. This according to Javedkar is 'Enough Evidence' to prove AK to be a terrorist. Makes me laugh out loud.
3. Mr. Prakash Javedkar further added that there wasn't much of a "difference between an anarchist and a terrorist".
4. Honestly, I never expected members of NAMO's group to stoop so low. Alright, we live in a Kleptocratic world, but it does not mean that we become an absolute Connivokrasy.
5. Going by Mr. Javedkar's standards, on the same wavelength, Arvind Kejriwal can also be compared to Shaheed Bhagat Singh, because SBS also called him self an anarchist. He rather wrote in favour of anarchy, which is a system of least centralized governance and maximum people's participation at micro level governance.
6. As per dictionary, being an anarchist is very different from being a terrorist.
7. To put its meaning in order, 'Anarchy' refers to a nation being a coglomerate of self governing societies or associations, freely constituted and free to function at local governance level.
8. Anarchism, as a political philosophy advocates stateless societies based on voluntary associations.
9. At its best, it is a form of very decentralized governance, and at its worst, anarchy means bad governance or loosely governed society, but by no stretch of imagination, can anarchy be interpreted as terrorism.
10. Yes, if it was nothing more than word-play, in light of the ongoing political match, in that case even Delhi CM should take it in his stride, but otherwise it is almost like calling a Yogi dressed in a langot, a nudist, which is not true.
🚩🔱🚩
©✒Guru Balwant Gurunay.⚔
2, According to PJ, AK had sometime referred to himself as an 'anarchist'. This according to Javedkar is 'Enough Evidence' to prove AK to be a terrorist. Makes me laugh out loud.
3. Mr. Prakash Javedkar further added that there wasn't much of a "difference between an anarchist and a terrorist".
4. Honestly, I never expected members of NAMO's group to stoop so low. Alright, we live in a Kleptocratic world, but it does not mean that we become an absolute Connivokrasy.
5. Going by Mr. Javedkar's standards, on the same wavelength, Arvind Kejriwal can also be compared to Shaheed Bhagat Singh, because SBS also called him self an anarchist. He rather wrote in favour of anarchy, which is a system of least centralized governance and maximum people's participation at micro level governance.
6. As per dictionary, being an anarchist is very different from being a terrorist.
7. To put its meaning in order, 'Anarchy' refers to a nation being a coglomerate of self governing societies or associations, freely constituted and free to function at local governance level.
8. Anarchism, as a political philosophy advocates stateless societies based on voluntary associations.
9. At its best, it is a form of very decentralized governance, and at its worst, anarchy means bad governance or loosely governed society, but by no stretch of imagination, can anarchy be interpreted as terrorism.
10. Yes, if it was nothing more than word-play, in light of the ongoing political match, in that case even Delhi CM should take it in his stride, but otherwise it is almost like calling a Yogi dressed in a langot, a nudist, which is not true.
🚩🔱🚩
©✒Guru Balwant Gurunay.⚔
No comments:
Post a Comment